In New Delhi, the High Court ruled that posting celebratory videos or social media updates after a bail order does not automatically justify cancelling that bail. Judge Ravinder Dudeja rejected a petition from complainant Zafeer Alam, who asked the court to revoke the bail granted to Manish, the accused in a case involving Sections 436, 457, 380 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Alam said Manish and his associates had broken bail conditions by waving weapons, creating fear in the neighbourhood, and threatening him on social media. He also claimed a co‑accused was seen outside his home on June 12, 2025. However, the court held that mere celebration posts do not count as intimidation unless they contain a clear threat or act of intimidation.
The judge noted that several screenshots were presented, but the court found no evidence they were meant to frighten Alam. The High Court reminded parties that canceling bail requires strong, overwhelming proof—such as interference with justice or abuse of liberty—rather than isolated online posts.
Because no police complaint followed Alam’s allegations about post‑bail threats, the court found no material to justify bail cancellation. The petition was dismissed, leaving Manish’s bail in place.
Source: aninews
Stay informed on all the latest news, real-time breaking news updates, and follow all the important headlines in world News on Latest NewsX. Follow us on social media Facebook, Twitter(X), Gettr and subscribe our Youtube Channel.
